"We Track the Financial Collapse For You, so You'll Thrive and Profit, In Spite of It... "

Fortunes will soon be made (and saved). Subscribe for free now. Get our vital, dispatches on gold, silver and sound-money delivered to your email inbox daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Safeguard your financial future. Get our crucial, daily updates.

"We Track the Financial Collapse For You,
so You'll Thrive and Profit, In Spite of It... "

Fortunes will soon be made (and saved). Subscribe for free now. Get our vital, dispatches on gold, silver and sound-money delivered to your email inbox daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We’re All Hedge Funds Now, Part 3: Even The Swiss Are Gambling

Let’s start with the latest on the global descent into negative interest rates:

Fed would consider negative rates if economy soured – Yellen

(Reuters) – The Federal Reserve would consider pushing interest rates below zero if the U.S. economy took a serious turn for the worse, Fed Chair Janet Yellen said on Wednesday.

“Potentially anything – including negative interest rates – would be on the table. But we would have to study carefully how they would work here in the U.S. context,” Yellen told a House of Representatives committee.

This would happen if the economy were to “deteriorate in a significant way,” she said, adding that she believed negative rates “would have some at least modest favorable effect on banks’ incentives to lend.”

Janet Yellen is now firmly in the central banking “whatever it takes” mainstream. And since — if the ongoing contraction in manufacturing is any indication — the economy is indeed “deteriorating in a significant way,” the US is now likely to join Europe in pushing rates down (or allowing rates to fall) to negative territory.

But already, the impact of zero and near-zero rates has been seismic. Virtually every class of financial entity, from retiree to central bank, has, driven by a need for yield, begun taking the kinds of chances that used to be associated with gambling addiction or drug abuse. See the previous two entries in this series: We’re All Hedge Funds Now and We’re All Hedge Funds Now, Part 2: Tech Startups And Nigerian Bonds.

The latest bit of surreal news on this front concerns the Swiss National Bank, once upon a time the virtual definition of rock-solid risk aversion, and its growing and highly volatile — get this — equity portfolio:

Swiss central bank owns big stake in troubled drug maker

(CNN Money) -Switzerland might be known for making precise clocks, but its timing couldn’t be worse on at least one investment.

The Swiss central bank increased its stake in Valeant Pharmaceuticals (VRX) right before the controversial U.S. pharmaceutical company was accused of Enron-like fraud.

First, you might be wondering, what is a European central bank doing owning stocks in the first place? In recent years the Swiss National Bank has used its swelling currency reserves to acquire equities. The central bank owned nearly $39 billion worth of shares in 2,569 U.S. companies as of the end of September.

The bank doesn’t handpick its stocks. The central bank’s website says it “only invests passively.” It uses a set of rules based on strategic benchmarks to determine which stocks to add to its massive portfolio.

Unfortunately for Swiss taxpayers, one of those stocks is Valeant, the troubled pharmaceutical company whose share price is in freefall mode.

The SNB owned 1.44 million shares of Valeant as of the end of September, up from 1.28 million at the end of June, according to Securities and Exchange Commission filings. The central bank said its Valeant stake was worth about $257 million.

Valeant stock has more than halved to $84, from $178 at the end of September. That means that if the Swiss central bank did not sell any shares, it is staring at a loss of about $146 million on its Valeant holdings.

Other than Valeant, the SNB’s portfolio looks like that of a typical large-cap equity fund’s nifty-50 zero-analysis list, which is to say Apple, Google, GE, Microsoft and other familiar multinationals. These are the names that money managers pile into at the top of a cycle when they start worrying about how to justify their overvalued losers and decide that whatever happens they won’t be fired for owning Apple. But of course at the top of a cycle even the Apples of the world are destined to fall by half or more.

So what does it mean that governments and central banks have become hedge funds?

Well, now that the monetary authorities have both the ability to push stocks up by buying them with newly-created currency and a burning need to do so in order to protect their multi-billion dollar equity portfolios, can there be any doubt about the course of monetary policy and general financial intervention in the next couple of years? No there can’t. In effect, Wall Street now gets to decide on stock prices rather than wager on them. Every 5% drop in the S&P 500 will be met with both easier money and direct buying by the Swiss, Japanese, Chinese, European and US central banks. Markets — in their old definition as price signaling mechanisms that tell capitalists what to do with capital — are effectively over.

As valuations become more and more unrealistic — either through rising share prices or falling corporate profits the scale of the necessary intervention will expand to the point that central bank equity portfolios will dwarf those of most hedge funds and mutual funds.

The amount of money creation necessary to buy up all those equities will spook the currency markets, leading to even more central bank intervention, which in turn will expose the contradiction inherent in the manipulate-all-markets strategy: Buying stocks with newly-created money is bad for exchange rate stability, but raising interest rates to protect a currency is bad for equity market valuations. One or the other will have to give.

9 thoughts on "We’re All Hedge Funds Now, Part 3: Even The Swiss Are Gambling"

  1. Pingback: r manga
  2. Pushing people into higher risk paper to chase returns is intentional on the part of the folks making the monetary “policy.”

    It makes it easier to legally steal their life savings.

  3. Oh, thank goodness! I was so worried that nobody was going to take up the slack as the corporations run out of credit to buy their own shares. This could very well mean that the equity markets will never go down again. Central banks don’t have to earn money or even borrow it because they print it. They could end up owning the entire equity market, which would mean the companies themselves. It’s another form of QE except through stocks instead of bonds. It’s a kind of “helicopter” money too because every stock holder who sells will receive newly printed money and that will help to devalue all our dollars so we will finally have price inflation for everything instead of just most things. I just don’t know why this wasn’t done years ago.

  4. QE and negative interest rates are illogical and make everyone looks stupid. Stupid as stupid can be, it will not survive. All stupid systems fail. It is like saying we want the economy car to keep moving and cannot slow down. So we change the design of the car to have a slow accelerator instead of a brake and the accelerator will be a fast accelerator. This car cannot slow down or stop and must accelerate till it crash.

  5. It used to be a ‘negative’ when someone lost their savings. However in the world of Central Banksters, such a negative can only be a ‘positive’. Anything to save the Banksters and our ‘Frankenstein system’ of Ponzi-nomics, growth and inflation at any cost. These unelected, unaccountable monetary Mandarins will ‘do whatever it takes’.

    Like a senior Russian said not long ago, War is coming to Europe. Only this time, I think the Germans, Swedes, Austrians et al have chosen to import it via ‘Syrian Refugees’. I guess this is the political arm of ‘do whatever it takes’. We have our own version in the US now.

    The ruling class gets ‘elected’ and uses all means to stay there. They make noises for the masses, and dutifully bow before the money’d classes to keep that power. That is their version of ‘whatever it takes’.

    The real question is: When do ‘the people’ do ‘whatever it takes’? My guess is we’re only a few years from finding out now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Zero Fees Gold IRA

Contact Us

Send Us Your Video Links

Send us a message.
We value your feedback,
questions and advice.

Cut through the clutter and mainstream media noise. Get free, concise dispatches on vital news, videos and opinions. Delivered to Your email inbox daily. You’ll never miss a critical story, guaranteed.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.