"We Track the Financial Collapse For You, so You'll Thrive and Profit, In Spite of It... "

Fortunes will soon be made (and saved). Subscribe for free now. Get our vital, dispatches on gold, silver and sound-money delivered to your email inbox daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Safeguard your financial future. Get our crucial, daily updates.

"We Track the Financial Collapse For You,
so You'll Thrive and Profit, In Spite of It... "

Fortunes will soon be made (and saved). Subscribe for free now. Get our vital, dispatches on gold, silver and sound-money delivered to your email inbox daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Why We’re Ungovernable, Part 10: The Republicans’ Civil War

Back when the republican party was actually the party of small government it was possible for country club moderates (white guys and their trophy wives who love the status quo and want to preserve the tax breaks that make it possible), Christian conservatives (who want the bible to be the template for the US legal system) and libertarians (who want a limited government that exists almost solely to protect property rights and individual freedoms) to coexist. While disagreeing on some major issues like abortion and foreign affairs, they could unite on taxes, regulation, school choice and enough else to hold the party together.

But gradually, the easy money flowing from the fiat currency/money center bank nexus has corrupted the country club republicans by coaxing them into a “governing coalition” with moderate democrats. This “political class” is all about perpetuating its own power, and the meaningless elections it oversees are just about the opposite of what Ronald Reagan (the last national leader to unite the party’s three main branches) had in mind when he promised to “never speak ill of another republican.”

Now the GOP is splintering, as libertarians and some fundamentalists give up on working within the current structure — and as a result stop self-censoring in the interest of party unity. Michigan libertarian congressman Justin Amash is a case in point. After being targeted by country club republicans in the party’s recent primary — and after winning easily — he was anything but magnanimous.

This alone — a politician honestly expressing his feelings for his opponents — is interesting enough. But what’s really fascinating is the reaction from the various parts of the political spectrum. The Washington Post, for instance, seems bemused:

Justin Amash’s absolutely amazing victory speech

Politicians who win campaigns, no matter how dirty, will almost always kiss and make up with their political opponents in their election-night speeches.

Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), of course, is not your average politician.

After defeating a Chamber of Commerce-backed candidate in his primary by 14 percentage points on Tuesday, the Ron Paul ally set about settling a few scores.

Former congressman Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.), who backed challenger Brian Ellis? “You are a disgrace. And I’m glad we could hand you one more loss before you fade into total obscurity and irrelevance.” (Hoekstra lost the state’s 2012 Senate race — and in the 2010 gubernatorial primary.)

Ellis? “You owe my family and this community an apology for your disgusting, despicable smear campaign. You had the audacity to try and call me today after running a campaign that was called the nastiest in the country. I ran for office to stop people like you.”

Ellis in one ad referred to a quote from Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), who labeled Amash “Al Qaeda’s best friend in Congress.”

In a later TV interview, Amash said: “I’m an Arab-American, and he has the audacity to say I’m al-Qaeda’s best friend in Congress? That’s pretty disgusting.”

Here’s the video of Amash’s speech, courtesy of WXMI-TV. The operative part starts about halfway in.

Amash 2014

Lightweight left-wing website Salon, meanwhile, posted pretty much the same neutral article but with a very different headline:

Tea Party nut’s telling tantrum: What Justin Amash’s victory speech revealed about GOP

At the other end of the spectrum, the libertarian news organization Liberty Crier’s headline had an “it’s about time” call for more such honesty:

Watching Justin Amash’s Amazingly Uncivil Victory Speech Might Make You Care About Politics Again

What to make of all this?
The republican party as it existed in Reagan’s day is over. Libertarians like Amash can’t abide “RINO” (republican in name only) leadership any longer and have decided to go their own way in terms of both policy and rhetoric. So they’re finally calling the hacks and careerists by name. For libertarians and their fans this will be, well, liberating.

But the near-term beneficiaries are obviously the democrats, who don’t have the same internal divisions: Pretty much all democrats are in favor of social freedom and government control of the economy, so it’s easy for them to unite behind flawed-but-generally-liberal candidates. They will as a result win a lot of national elections, and when republicans do win it will be because democrats in power have screwed up in some obvious and unforgivable way.

In those relatively rare shots at national power, the republicans will have to form European-style coalition governments including the same three groups that used to comprise the party. Because each faction will be able to demand tangible policy concessions as the price of joining, they might feel better respected than they do now.

This, however, is not a fix. Only when the fiat currency stops flowing will the political class lose its current power to buy elections. But at least the discourse from here on out will be a lot more fun.

11 thoughts on "Why We’re Ungovernable, Part 10: The Republicans’ Civil War"

  1. I favour Amesh over the other hacks of the GOP. He at least tried to reign in the US surveillance state. But alas it didn’t work well.

  2. Ungovernable ? It simply shows that there’s a change coming. And it seems the GOP “doesn’t” like it at all.

    It shows that the voters in the US are fed up with the current generation of politicians. Remember what happened with one Eric Cantor ? The voters send him packing. He wasn’t elected in spite having spent more money than his opponent.

  3. Enjoyed reading this article. If Justin is considered a ‘nut’ I guess I’m glad to be growing a shell!

  4. Thanks for this John, Well said.

    As a friend of mine once remarked, “The Democrats are the enemy. The Republicans are the traitors.”

    The only difference now is that some of the Republicans, the few who aren’t traitors, are no longer willing to buy the promise from the party establishment that someday soon we’ll get serious about reining in the runaway government … but first we have to win this upcoming election.

    After decades of someday never coming, those who’ve been conned time and again by the traitors have had enough.

    People talk a lot about how things will change if “we” can just get a Republican Senate Majority. Yeah, right. Some things never change. How is it that having a majority comprised of the likes of McCain, Graham, Alexander, Collins, McConnell, Tillis and their ilk would consitute an improvement. A change? Yeah, I guess kinda.. A real improvement? Hardly.

    Brian Ellis, who ran against Amash, exemplifies everything that’s wrong with the system, a corporatist for hire, backed by the execrable Chamber of Commerce, willing to sling whatever mud is necessary.

    The statists lost this one, for which I’m quite happy. But the fact is, they don’t lose many. And that means those of us who aren’t feeding at the trough in some way will continued to get screwed by the combine.

    Electoral politics is a complete scam. It exists to make people think they have control. Ha. As Emma Goldman said, “If voting changed anything, they’d make it illegal.” Ironically, it’s only those who haven’t sold out, such as Amash, who give it any legitimacy at all.

  5. The bankers are not quite “in control” the way they would like to be, otherwise they would never need bailouts. I see it more as a partnership with Washington, each needing the other.

  6. You don’t seem to understand the root of the cause here. The Banks are in control not the politicians and until you get that through your heads it doesn’t matter who is elected. And to understand that read the history of the bankers connection to our presidents. Read “All The Presidents Bankers,” by Naomi Prins and be enlightened about who runs the economy and the elected officials are there for their bidding. Johnson and Eisenhower were very cozey with the bankers and Kennedy and Nixon weren’t. You don’t want the government involved in the economy but then if it isn’t the bankers rule. The stupids on the right will never get it I’m afraid.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Zero Fees Gold IRA

Contact Us

Send Us Your Video Links

Send us a message.
We value your feedback,
questions and advice.

Cut through the clutter and mainstream media noise. Get free, concise dispatches on vital news, videos and opinions. Delivered to Your email inbox daily. You’ll never miss a critical story, guaranteed.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.