Brent Johnson (Milkshakes, Markets and Madness) hosts his friend John Butler for a friendly-but-probing debate on whether US military involvement in Iran is a geopolitical master class or a historic mistake. Both agree there is a plan, the situation is tragic, and the GCC’s free-rider arrangement with the US is ending—but they diverge sharply on who benefits most: Johnson argues the United States is best insulated relatively (Western Hemisphere focus, Venezuela oil secured, can weaponize chaos), while Butler argues Russia emerges as the clear winner due to land power, Caspian trade with Iran, and the US failing to pursue offshore balancing. Both agree a scorched-earth US policy in the Gulf would plunge the world including China into a decade-long depression.
The free-rider arrangement is ending: The Gulf’s post-WWII “free rider” model of US-guaranteed security in exchange for rents is no longer sustainable as Iran, backed by Russia and China, directly challenges the arrangement. Butler sees this regional transition as inevitable regardless of short-term military outcomes, with Iran playing the long game via Russian/Chinese support.
Declining empires love sowing chaos: Johnson’s key argument is that if Iran can use a drone to shut down Hormuz indefinitely, so can the US—and with Venezuelan oil taken off the board, North America and Russia relatively benefit from Gulf disruption while everyone else suffers. Butler agrees declining hegemons rely disproportionately on military power because “it’s affordable” but warns this accelerates imperial decline like late-19th-century Britain in India.
Nuclear proliferation calculus: Butler argues the more the US plays heavy-handed, the more likely Russia and China eventually hand Iran a bomb as a “Merry Christmas” gift just to get the US off their back. Johnson pushes back that no country has successfully become nuclear when the US was actively trying to stop them (except Pakistan), and this strike has lowered Iran’s odds, not raised them.
Russia as the disproportionate winner: Butler’s core thesis is that Russia benefits most because of land-power geography, decades of strategic planning, Caspian Sea trade links to Iran, and the ability to fill Europe’s energy void. Johnson concedes Russia is well-insulated but argues the US is equally or better positioned given Western Hemisphere focus and its ability to project sea power to deny others access.
Global depression is the base case if scorched-earth plays out: Both agree closing Hormuz for a sustained period throws the entire world—including the US—into depression, because Russia’s current infrastructure cannot fill the Gulf’s void for 10-20 years. Butler predicts this would reorder European governments, force China into isolationism drawing on cultural memory of hardship, and potentially leave Iran as the eventual regional Persian Gulf hegemon once the artificial Gulf states collapse without their sugar daddy.
Isabella Kaminska (The Blind Spot, The Peg) offers a contrarian take that current Middle East chaos may be the culmination of a decadeslong Cold War rather than the start of World War III, drawing on historian Polybius’s theory of anacyclosis (cyclical political change) to frame the US transition from republic to empire. She argues that confrontation with authoritarian rivals historically requires temporary suspension of democratic norms, and sees Trump as potentially a necessary evil—a Pilsudski or Augustus figure—who could either restore order or accelerate decline depending on how succession plays out. On monetary policy, she steelmans the Trump tariff agenda as essential for reshoring national-security manufacturing and views the dollar-denominated stablecoin system as a way for America to have its cake and eat it, extending dollar hegemony extraterritorially while everyone else races to defend monetary sovereignty.
This may be the end, not the beginning, of World War III: Kaminska is contrarian-optimistic, arguing that what feels like the beginning of global war is more likely the culmination of the decadeslong hybrid Cold War reaching its kinetic endpoint. She warns against assuming Iran will play out like Iraq—the current war is never the last war.
Anacyclosis and the Republic-to-Empire transition: Drawing on Polybius’s cyclical theory of political change (which influenced the American Founders), Kaminska frames Trump as potentially a necessary authoritarian transition figure like Pilsudski or Augustus—coming after faction wars and economic stagnation to restore order. The critical risk is succession: Augustus managed the transition but failed on succession, and Trump’s legacy depends on whether temporary emergency powers become permanent.
Tariffs are about national security, not imbalances: Following Michael Pettis’s framework, Kaminska argues open economies in a system with closed economies inevitably lose control over industrial policy. The real goal of tariffs isn’t fixing trade imbalances—it’s reshoring enough manufacturing to ensure the US hegemon can still guarantee global peace, which COVID revealed was at risk.
Stablecoins as dollar imperialism and the race for monetary sovereignty: Stablecoins allow the US to expand dollar rails beyond where correspondent banking retreated after 2008, potentially shifting the system toward fiscal dominance since T-bill supply dictates stablecoin profitability. Every other major economy (EU, UK, China) is scrambling with CBDCs and local-currency stablecoins to defend against dollar-denominated stablecoins flooding their systems.
Gold tokenization skepticism: Kaminska is befuddled by tokenized gold’s value proposition—diehard gold holders still face middleman risk (now two: custodian and issuer), while issuers can’t match the interest-rate arbitrage that makes dollar stablecoins profitable. Without the Treasury yield subsidy, tokenized gold requires management fees that make it uncompetitive at the consumer level, though it may appeal in countries that can’t bear to use the dollar.
Robert Kiyosaki (Rich Dad Poor Dad) draws parallels between his Vietnam War experience as a Marine pilot flying oil tanker escort missions and today’s Middle East conflict—noting the same carrier he flew off (the Tripoli) is currently in Hormuz, meaning “we’re still fighting the same war” over oil. His most urgent warning centers on the 1974 setup of ERISA/401ks combined with the petrodollar, arguing the boomer generation is being set up Charlie Brown-style for a catastrophic rug pull that will trigger mass homelessness when the S&P 500 bubble bursts. He recounts his visceral experience during Zimbabwe’s currency collapse—held at AK-47 point by “war vet” hoodlums—to illustrate what happens when fiat fails, urging listeners to own physical gold and silver (he cites Jim Rickards’ $35,000 gold target and his own $200 silver call) rather than paper promises.
The 401k/ERISA 1974 trap: Kiyosaki frames the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act and the concurrent petrodollar creation as a deliberate setup to steal boomer wealth. With the S&P 500 at all-time highs in a bubble, he predicts the crash will produce “mass homelessness” among former middle-class retirees in the first generation of this scale.
Same war, different decade: Having flown off the carrier Tripoli in Vietnam—a war he argues was about denying China access to Vietnamese oil—Kiyosaki notes that same carrier is now in the Strait of Hormuz fighting another oil war. The Vietnam homecoming experience (being spit on, hit with rotten eggs) cemented his lifelong skepticism of government systems.
Zimbabwe as preview of currency collapse: Kiyosaki recounts being held at AK-47 gunpoint in Zimbabwe during the hyperinflation collapse, having everything stolen, then helping a white farmer woman burn her own farm down before fleeing. He sees the same patterns repeating in America and urges people to read “When Money Destroys Nations” by Philip Haslam.
Central banks quietly dumping treasuries for gold: He argues the biggest untold secret is how many banks are rotating out of US treasuries into gold, while price suppression by major institutions keeps gold and silver artificially low. Americans miss this because mainstream financial media (“CNBBS”) hides the real story.
Real assets over paper: Kiyosaki is actively adding to physical gold (he owns the Cisco gold mine in Utah) and silver (stores American Silver Eagles in a Zurich vault), along with Bitcoin and Ethereum positions. His price targets—$35,000 gold per Rickards and $200 silver—stem from the Fed’s inability to stop printing, referenced via Larry Lepard’s book “The Big Print.”
Cut through the clutter and mainstream media noise. Get free, concise dispatches on vital news, videos and opinions. Delivered to Your email inbox daily. You’ll never miss a critical story, guaranteed.