Top Three Videos – August 30, 2026
Gold & Silver About to Go Vertical? Michael Oliver Warns of a “Nuclear” Financial Event...(Aug 24, 2026)
Liberty & Finance...
Summary
Michael Oliver of Momentum Structural Analysis argues that gold, silver, and mining stocks have entered a genuine breakout driven by what he calls a looming “nuclear event” in government debt, with weakening U.S. Treasuries, accelerating monetary expansion, and declining confidence in fiat currencies forcing capital toward monetary metals. He sees miners as extraordinarily undervalued—XAU historically averaged roughly 25% of the gold price but recently traded near 9%—and believes their breakout from a 13-year relative-performance base could produce a rapid doubling versus gold, while silver could exceed his previous $300–$500 target and gold could surpass $8,000–$9,000. Oliver also expects financial stocks and the broader equity market to weaken sharply, potentially leaving the S&P 500 down 25–30% from its high by year-end and making the next six months “shocking” for investors.
Top 5 Key Topics
- Miners are breaking out after 13 years: XAU historically traded around 25% of an ounce of gold, with a roughly 18–35% range, before collapsing to 4% and spending 13 years mostly between 5% and 8.5%. With the ratio now around 9%, Oliver sees roughly 18% as an initial resistance target, implying miners could double relative to gold merely by returning to the bottom of their historical valuation range.
- Government debt is “the big one”: Unlike the dot-com collapse, when the S&P lost 50% and NASDAQ 100 lost 82%, or the 2007–09 crisis centered on private mortgage debt, Oliver says today’s problem is sovereign debt itself. He expects governments and central banks to “print, print” to defend bond markets, accelerating monetary degradation and driving gold higher.
- Silver could exceed $300–$500 and gold $9,000: Oliver previously targeted silver at $300–$500 but now says he is lifting that target because $300–$500 “could be on the lower end” once the current congestion breaks. Gold’s 1976–80 and 2002–11 bull markets were both roughly eightfold moves, and he says matching those would require approximately $8,000–$9,000 gold from the current cycle’s bear-market low, with today’s sovereign-debt crisis potentially producing an even larger move.
- Stocks and banks are “dancing on glass”: XLF and KBE have broken intermediate momentum structures, which Oliver compares with financial-sector weakness preceding the 2007 market peak, while the S&P’s important long-term momentum levels sit only about 8–10% below current prices. He expects the broader downturn to become obvious by Q4 and says investors could eventually confront stocks sitting 25–30% below their highs.
- A major capital rotation toward monetary metals: Oliver believes Treasuries can no longer serve their traditional role as the safe alternative during an equity bear market, leaving gold, silver, and miners as the major destination for escaping capital. He predicts the next six months will be “shocking” across markets as investors belatedly recognize government-debt instability, dollar weakness, stock-market deterioration, and the monetary-metals breakout.
Email in**@***********in.com or Call 952-929-7006 to Contact
Miles Franklin.
Mention “DollarCollapse.com” for Preferred Pricing.
Get authentic products at fair pricing.
Peter Zeihan: A Post-American Alliance for the Middle East...(Aug 20, 2026)
Zeihan on Geopolitics...
Summary
Peter Zeihan argues that the proposed Pakistan–Turkey–Saudi Arabia mutual-defense pact looks impractical today because the three countries face fundamentally different security priorities: Saudi Arabia is focused on Iran, Pakistan on India, and Turkey on Russia and Europe. However, he believes rapid U.S. retrenchment from the Eastern Hemisphere and the Persian Gulf will force secondary powers to secure their own neighborhoods, making deeper cooperation among these three Sunni states increasingly logical. By around 2030, Zeihan expects their complementary capabilities—Saudi Arabia’s energy exports, Turkey’s military strength as NATO’s largest army, and Pakistan’s strategic capabilities—to drive closer economic and security integration as they prepare for a “post-American world.”
Top 5 Key Topics
- A Middle Eastern NATO: Representatives of Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia met in Mecca to discuss a pact featuring a NATO-style clause under which an attack on one would be considered an attack on all.
- Different enemies make today’s alliance weak: Saudi Arabia views Iran as its immediate threat after months of Iranian and Houthi drone and missile attacks, while Pakistan’s overriding concern is India and Turkey is more concerned with Europe and a potential confrontation with Russia. Zeihan therefore calls the idea that all three would currently “bleed” for one another “honestly kind of silly.”
- America’s withdrawal changes the equation: Zeihan argues the U.S. is rapidly retreating from the Eastern Hemisphere and predicts its role as the determining security power in the Persian Gulf could “collapse” before the end of the current administration, possibly even before the end of the year.
- Energy and religion create natural alignment: All three countries are Sunni Muslim, Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest oil exporter, and Turkey and Pakistan are energy importers whose alternative supplies could become less reliable in a deglobalizing world. Zeihan expects these structural factors to push them toward closer economic and security integration.
- Preparing for a post-American 2030: Zeihan says the arrangement probably will not work this year or next, but by 2030 the geopolitical environment could make it common sense. He sees Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia as capable regional powers already laying the groundwork for a world in which the U.S. no longer guarantees their security.
If World War III Breaks Out: What Happens to Your Money...(August 28, 2026)
Maneco64...
Summary
Maneco 64 argues that escalating tensions between Russia and Western Europe make a wider war worth preparing for financially, using Britain’s experience during the 1914 financial crisis as a model for what could happen if today’s financial system suddenly freezes. He recounts how Britain’s financial system effectively seized up within roughly 13 days, prompting a five-month London Stock Exchange closure, a four-day bank holiday, emergency paper currency, a Bank of England rate increase from 3% to 10%, and the practical suspension of the gold standard. His conclusion is that investors should keep some physical gold and silver outside banks and brokerage systems—not because war is certain, but because financial assets, ETFs, banks, brokers, and bullion dealers could become inaccessible during a severe wartime liquidity crisis.
Top 5 Key Topics
- Growing risk of a wider European war: Manco 64 says he has never seen as much East-West brinkmanship in his 61 years, pointing to Russian threats against British military targets and UK, German, and broader European support for Ukraine. He believes the U.S. would probably become involved because of its enormous economic, military, political, and social interests in Western Europe.
- The 1914 financial system froze in 13 days: After Austria’s July 23 ultimatum to Serbia, mass security selling and gold hoarding followed; the London Stock Exchange closed July 31, the Bank of England raised its rate from roughly 3% to 10%, banks underwent a four-day holiday from August 3–7, and Britain introduced emergency Bradbury notes after declaring war on Germany on August 4. The stock exchange did not reopen until January 4, 1915.
- War could lock investors out of their assets: He does not predict an exact replay of 1914 but warns that banks, brokers, exchanges, ETFs, miners, and other paper investments could temporarily become inaccessible during a modern financial shutdown. He speculates that CBDCs could potentially play a role analogous to the emergency paper currency introduced in 1914.
- Physical gold and silver as outside-system insurance: Unlike 1914’s gold-standard system, today’s financial architecture rests heavily on fiat currency and government debt, which he considers fragile. He therefore recommends prudently holding some physical gold and silver outside the financial system, arguing that bullion dealers could rapidly run out of inventory if a major war began.
- Financial fragility may encourage war: Manco 64 invokes Gerald Celente’s phrase, “when all else fails, they take you to war,” arguing that Western governments may be increasingly desperate because their debt-based financial system is under strain. He stresses that preparation should extend beyond money to strong relationships with neighbors, friends, and local communities.