Summary
The world is undergoing a significant shift from a rules-based economic order to a new era of economic statecraft, where nations are using all policy tools strategically, and the US is reasserting its global dominance through various means, potentially leading to a new balance of power and altering the global economic and political landscape.
Economic Statecraft & Command Economy
Economic statecraft unifies fiscal, monetary, FX, trade, and energy policies into a strategic framework asking “What is GDP for?” to use GDP as a “big stick” for achieving geopolitical objectives rather than treating it as merely a statistical measure.
US reindustrialization strategy parallels Adam Smith and David Ricardo’s principles of industrializing domestically and trading, rejecting the model of investing capital in cheap foreign countries and becoming consumers rather than producers.
Trump’s factory rebuilding plan requires radical Fed and market control toward a command economy on the production side while maintaining the consumer side, avoiding the collapse seen under Gorbachev’s reforms in the Soviet Union.
The Office of Strategic Capital within the Department of War coordinates public and private resources to fund critical industries like innovation, manufacturing, and defense as national security issues, representing one of the biggest market tailwinds in the next 5-10 years.
Modern Monroe Doctrine & Sphere of Influence
US is reclaiming its sphere of influence through a modern Monroe Doctrine in the Americas, Asia, and Europe, holding territory and borders like the board game Risk to prevent China and Russia from gaining power.
Trump’s Venezuela intervention was a high-risk political move without congressional approval, putting boots on the ground in a country allied with US adversaries where harm to service members could have been catastrophic for his presidency.
US prioritization of the Western Hemisphere enables more effective power projection globally when chosen, not representing global abandonment but strategic focus on domestic neighborhood for enhanced geopolitical positioning.
Energy & Resource Control
US is cutting off China’s energy supply by controlling Venezuela and Iran, preventing China from accessing these resources even without selling the oil itself, implementing “physical censorship” in the global energy market.
Potential return of letters of marque could incentivize private sector to seize Russian oil tankers with rewards like 50% of cargo or profits, achieving geopolitical goals more efficiently than state action alone through legalized privateering.
Digital Currency Weaponization
Dollar stablecoins function as a stealth weapon undermining local authorities’ control over economies in countries adopting them instead of national currencies, entrenching US power globally without traditional dollar hegemony constraints.
US could use stablecoins to drain capital from other countries’ banks into a new network, maintaining dollar hegemony without the Triffin paradox, effectively creating new Eurodollars that move faster and reach the unbanked population.
Digital currencies are weaponized to “steal sovereignty” from competing nations as detailed in Santiago Capital’s special report on Stablecoin Sovereignty, representing a key pillar of economic statecraft strategy.
Military & Industrial Paradox
US economic system undermines its military power due to lack of domestic manufacturing for military goods, creating vulnerability despite leveraging military and economic dominance, potentially leading to US-China clash and split world order.
Directed energy weapons, referenced in Havana syndrome attacks on US diplomats, could provide geostrategic advantage with potential undisclosed capabilities that strengthen US positioning beyond publicly acknowledged technology.