The speaker argues the Federal Reserve is the signature example of cronyism — policy benefiting special interests at the expense of the public — and that Wall Street lobbied for it and profited from it rather than being restrained by it. He contends the pre-Fed panic narrative is false on two counts: modern output estimates show the depressions were neither as frequent nor as severe as taught, and the real instability came from government intervention, especially the National Banking System’s branch banking prohibitions and reserve pyramiding. He documents that New York’s share of bankers’ balances fell from 100% to 57.5% between 1886 and 1912, then rose back to 77% by 1928 while the dollar overtook the pound as world reserve currency at 55% of global FX reserves, with the Fed’s 55% money supply increase from 1921 to 1928 producing the boom that became the Great Depression.
Rothbard’s first Supreme Court citation: Clarence Thomas approvingly cited The Progressive Era in a concurrence on Monsanto’s regulatory capture of the EPA, quoting Rothbard on the “profitable alliance between corporations and government” where firms seek government cartelization after private cartels fail. The speaker calls the Wall Street–Fed relationship the ultimate case of that alliance.
Wall Street’s two problems before 1913: New York banks were losing bankers’ balances to Chicago and St. Louis after both became central reserve cities in 1887, prompting National City’s Frank Vanderlip to write in 1908 that “something radical” was needed to meet the competition. Separately, the dollar ranked behind the pound, franc, and mark, and Paul Warburg of Kuhn Loeb complained Wall Street paid “annual tribute” to Europe — his objection being not tribute itself but that it flowed the wrong direction.
Jekyll Island and the “patriotic conspiracy” framing: Roughly six men — Warburg, Nelson Aldrich, Henry P. Davison, Vanderlip, A. Piatt Andrew, and circumstantially Benjamin Strong — drafted what became the Federal Reserve Act at JP Morgan’s exclusive Georgia club in late 1910. He mocks Roger Lowenstein’s description of them as “patriotic conspirators,” asking where the non-patriotic conspiracies are, and notes federalreservehistory.org now concedes the meeting laid the foundation.
Capture of the machinery after passage: Warburg went onto the Federal Reserve Board and Strong became governor of the New York Fed, with Warburg writing to Strong that he should “frame the bylaws so as to give yourself sufficient power.” Strong dominated the system until his 1928 death; his old firm Bankers Trust became one of the Fed’s first primary dealers, and Warburg’s own International Acceptance Bank was among the few banks the Fed bought acceptances from.
Who gained and who paid: The 65% money supply increase from 1914 to 1918 flowed to early receivers — JP Morgan and Company’s assets rose 110%, Morgan Jr. was the 13th richest American and George Baker the fourth — while the public absorbed roughly 50% consumer price inflation and falling real incomes. Wall Street also financed its own think tank, the Council on Foreign Relations, whose Foreign Affairs praised Strong’s “vision, wisdom, and energy” in July 1929.
Costa argues the coming market break will resemble a 1970s–2000 hybrid rather than 2008, assigning a very low probability to a correlation-to-one deflationary shock and expecting gold and hard assets to act as safe havens while the dollar underperforms other fiat currencies. He sees the CAPE ratio above 40 — higher than 1929 and only matched at the tech bubble — and expects that when tech cash flows go from strongly positive to deeply negative and balance sheets lever up, capital rotates into mining, infrastructure, and energy. His central case is a secular metals bull market driven by stagnant supply, with mining down to roughly 1% of total market cap versus a historical 10–15%, and he expects copper to potentially double over two to three years, calling it the real AI trade.
Rejecting the 2008 analog: Costa walks through 2020 (classic deflationary shock, correlation to one, Fed intervention in Treasuries), early 2000s (correlation to one for a few months, then sectors disconnecting as smart money rotated), and the 1970s recessions where Treasuries sold off alongside equities and gold was the safe haven. He believes the COVID-era policy response triggered an inflationary regime, making the 1970s template the relevant one.
Overbought dollar and real rates as the setup: The 10-year real rate is at two-year highs and 30-year yields near two-decade highs, driven by both rising nominals and falling breakevens, while markets have priced out Fed hikes to under 10%. He argues miners are the most oversold in years — in some short-term measures as bad as 2008 — and that a reversal of the last three to six months of dollar and rate strength would be a special tailwind.
Managing expectations on gold: He declines to project a repeat of the 2022 low near $1,700 running to $5,600 over three and a half years, expecting instead a choppy digestion phase that needs to establish credibility before a bigger move. He cautions that NASDAQ’s habit of instantly recovering 20–30% declines has conditioned investors to expect too much too fast.
The supply case for a secular bull: Gold production hit a record 3,672 tonnes, barely above the 2018 record of 3,663 tonnes, with companies mining deposits found in the 1980s and 90s and grades deteriorating. Despite profitability he says exceeds anything since possibly the 1970s, miners have cut rather than raised exploration budgets, which he says only lengthens the cycle and makes an M&A wave likely.
Silver exposure and the SIL problem: Roughly 73% of silver comes as a byproduct at near-zero incremental cost versus $15–25 AISC for primary producers, and Costa notes only about 20% of SIL’s holdings derive more than 50% of revenue from silver, meaning the purest institutional silver vehicle offers little actual silver exposure. He still favors owning primary silver names, expects triple-digit silver eventually, and likes gold-copper deposits because gold’s safe-haven behavior complements copper’s high beta to the economy.
The speaker argues the culture war was only a proxy war and that its real objective — reinserting the dissidents who were driven out of universities, newspapers, and the BBC — remains unfinished, noting that endowed chairs cost only $5 to $15 million and yet no wealthy donor is buying trouble at Oxford or Cambridge. He contends a covert operations community that became unaccountable around 1969 manufactures narratives that cannot be contradicted, citing the 77 US Nobel laureates who signed a letter defending EcoHealth Alliance despite lacking domain expertise, and calls Epstein “almost certainly a covert operations hub” and a state-sponsored program rather than a lone predator. He argues societies must hold certain things axiomatic rather than debating them endlessly with scoundrels, and that the singular task of the West is restoring a compelling indefinite human future — which requires spreading beyond a single atmosphere given weapons technology in place since the 1952 hydrogen device.
The unfinished reinsertion of dissidents: He argues Western civilization consists of institutions capable of recognizing and promoting quality, and cannot be rescued while its leading dissident thinkers sit outside the citadels that traditionally protected them. He points to Frances Oldham Kelsey — who stood alone against the thalidomide industry from the University of Chicago — and claims that in the age of Fauci such a person would be out of work and labeled a grifter, charlatan, and malcontent.
Covert operations and the destruction of ground truth: He dates the shift to 1969 when MIT physics faculty, many of them Manhattan Project veterans, walked out over Vietnam, and argues covert means deniable, which authorizes gaslighting and destroying anyone who uncovers an operation. He cites the CIA allegedly burying the lab-leak narrative for a virus he says may have killed north of 10 million people, and recommends Mike Benz’s work on USAID as a CIA funding channel.
Against “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”: He calls the principle terrible and says the skeptic movement should be discarded because science already knows how to do skepticism. His argument is structural: clandestine means secret and covert means deniable, so demanding that evidentiary standard guarantees nothing can ever be proven.
The Epstein claim: He says Epstein told him in 2004 that he ran a multi-billion-dollar FX hedge fund staffed by Brooklyn yeshiva brokers across two trading floors — one at Villard House on Madison Avenue, one on an outfitted Boeing 727 — details he says were self-defeating because trades that size cannot move without leaving a data trail. He notes editors, not journalists, repeatedly spiked the story, and that the New York Times published Epstein’s handwritten note reading “never was a hedge fund manager” on June 16, 2026, vindicating a point he says took 22 years to land.
Axioms over infinite debate: Invoking the Declaration’s twin moves — self-evident truths and endowment by a creator — he argues the founders deliberately foreclosed the infinite regress of “why,” and that free peoples should likewise refuse to debate their own definitional premises with the woke, communism, or radical Islam. He extends this to his own field, describing talks in physics departments that he must erase afterward, being told he is “a visitor who is not a visitor,” and calling string theory’s monopoly a lie told for 42 years without contradiction.
Cut through the clutter and mainstream media noise. Get free, concise dispatches on vital news, videos and opinions. Delivered to Your email inbox daily. You’ll never miss a critical story, guaranteed.