NATO’s plan to deploy 250,000 troops to Ukraine risks escalating the conflict into a broader war, driven by neoconservative interests and neglecting the desires of local populations, amidst rising global tensions and civil unrest.
NATO’s Escalation in Ukraine
NATO plans to deploy 250,000 troops to Ukraine in a last-ditch effort to prop up the collapsing regime and salvage an unwinnable war.
This deployment mirrors NATO’s previous proxy wars in Bosnia (1995) and Kosovo (1999), where they bombed Serbs for supporting Russia.
Neoconservative Influence on Foreign Policy
Neocons like Lindsey Graham, John Bolton, and Bill Crystal are driving the US towards war, disregarding human life and national interests.
Netanyahu, a neocon aligned with Crystal and Bolton, influenced Trump to push for war with Russia, as seen in their actions in Gaza.
Historical Patterns and Predictions
Martin Armstrong’s Socrates computer program has accurately predicted major events, including the 2008 financial crisis and the 2014 Ukraine conflict.
Global conflicts can spread like a contagion, with civil wars in Japan, England, and Russia occurring simultaneously in ancient times.
Migration and Civil Unrest
Mass migration in Western countries is a controlled demolition of societies, leading to civil unrest and riots in the UK, Ireland, and other nations.
The EU’s migration policy, initially driven by Merkel’s personal reputation, has led to massive civil unrest and threatens pension fund stability.
Economic Challenges and EU Instability
The EU economy is shrinking by 25% due to COVID, climate change, and sanctions on Russia and Germany, facing a sharp recession until 2028.
The EU will eventually break up due to its flawed structure and economic crisis, with parties like AFD in Germany gaining popularity.
Cultural Differences and Historical Impact
The Athenian law of retribution has dominated the Balkans, where mafias like the Armenian mafia practice collective punishment.
Neocons have a tribal mindset, seeing themselves as Sunni, Shiite, or Kurd rather than Iraqi or Syrian, which influences their foreign policy decisions.